QPMS
/
qpms
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Compare Reid's (SCUFF-EM) and Taylor's to Kristensson VSWFs. 

Former-commit-id: 1c38f7b399de84ed3a15b55ce67058281fc26342
This commit is contained in:
Marek Nečada 2019-07-10 11:46:01 +03:00
parent 0461c47565
commit 1a7d41ccfd
2 changed files with 15 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
notes/conventions.md
View File

@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Literature convention tables
| Source | VSWF definition | E/M interrelations | VSWF norm | CS Phase | Field expansion | Radiated power | Notes | | Source | VSWF definition | E/M interrelations | VSWF norm | CS Phase | Field expansion | Radiated power | Notes |
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |
| Kristensson I \cite kristensson_spherical_2014 | \f[ \wfkcreg, \wfkcout= \dots \f] | \f[ | Kristensson I \cite kristensson_spherical_2014 | \f[ \wfkc = \dots \f] where \f$\wfkc\f$ is either of \f$ \wfkcreg, \wfkcout, \dots \f$ based on the radial (spherical Bessel) function type. | \f[
\wfkcreg_{1lm} = \frac{1}{k}\nabla\times\wfkcreg_{2lm}, \\ \wfkcreg_{1lm} = \frac{1}{k}\nabla\times\wfkcreg_{2lm}, \\
\wfkcreg_{2lm} = \frac{1}{k}\nabla\times\wfkcreg_{1lm}, \wfkcreg_{2lm} = \frac{1}{k}\nabla\times\wfkcreg_{1lm},
\f] and analogously for outgoing waves \f$ \wfkcout \f$, eq. (2.8) onwards. | | Yes, in the spherical harmonics definition, cf. sect. D.2. | \f[ \f] and analogously for outgoing waves \f$ \wfkcout \f$, eq. (2.8) onwards. | | Yes, in the spherical harmonics definition, cf. sect. D.2. | \f[
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Literature convention tables
\f] but for plane wave expansion \cite kristensson_spherical_2014 sect. 2.5 K. uses a different definition (same as in Kristensson II). | \f[ \f] but for plane wave expansion \cite kristensson_spherical_2014 sect. 2.5 K. uses a different definition (same as in Kristensson II). | \f[
P = \frac{1}{2} \sum_n \left( \abs{\wckcout_n}^2 +\Re \left(\wckcout_n\wckcreg_n^{*}\right)\right) P = \frac{1}{2} \sum_n \left( \abs{\wckcout_n}^2 +\Re \left(\wckcout_n\wckcreg_n^{*}\right)\right)
\f] | The \f$ \wckcreg, \wckcout \f$ coefficients have dimension \f$ \sqrt{\mathrm{W}} \f$. | \f] | The \f$ \wckcreg, \wckcout \f$ coefficients have dimension \f$ \sqrt{\mathrm{W}} \f$. |
| Kristensson II \cite kristensson_scattering_2016 | \f[ \wfkrreg, \wfkrout= \dots \f] | \f[ | Kristensson II \cite kristensson_scattering_2016 | \f[ \wfkr = \dots \f] where \f$\wfkr\f$ is either of \f$ \wfkrreg, \wfkrout, \dots \f$ based on the radial (spherical Bessel) function type. | \f[
\nabla\times\wfkrreg_{\tau n} = k\wfkrreg_{\overline{\tau} n}, \nabla\times\wfkrreg_{\tau n} = k\wfkrreg_{\overline{\tau} n},
\f] eq. (7.7) and analogously for outgoing waves \f$ \wfkrout \f$. | | | \f[ \f] eq. (7.7) and analogously for outgoing waves \f$ \wfkrout \f$. | | | \f[
\vect E = \sum_n \left( \wckrreg_n \wfkrreg_n + \wckrout_n \wfkrout_n \right), \vect E = \sum_n \left( \wckrreg_n \wfkrreg_n + \wckrout_n \wfkrout_n \right),
@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ Literature convention tables
\f] | \f[ \f] | \f[
P = \frac{1}{2k^2\eta_0\eta} \sum_n \left( \abs{\wckrout_n}^2 +\Re \left(\wckrout_n\wckrreg_n^{*}\right)\right) P = \frac{1}{2k^2\eta_0\eta} \sum_n \left( \abs{\wckrout_n}^2 +\Re \left(\wckrout_n\wckrreg_n^{*}\right)\right)
\f] | The \f$ \wckrreg, \wckrout \f$ coefficients have dimension \f$ \mathrm{V/m} \f$. | \f] | The \f$ \wckrreg, \wckrout \f$ coefficients have dimension \f$ \mathrm{V/m} \f$. |
| Reid \cite reid_electromagnetism_2016 | | \f[ | Reid \cite reid_electromagnetism_2016 | By examining the code, it appears that both `GetMNlmArray()` and `GetWaveMatrix()` with argument `MaxwellWaves = true` (with `MaxwellWaves = false` it seems to calculate nonsense) return the following w.r.t. Kristensson's "complex VSWFs": \f[
\wfr_{lmM} = i\wfkc_{1lm}, \\
\wfr_{lmN} = -\wfkc_{2lm}.
\f] | \f[
\nabla\times\wfr_{lmM} = -ik\wfr_{lmN}, \\ \nabla\times\wfr_{lmN} = +ik\wfr_{lmM}. \nabla\times\wfr_{lmM} = -ik\wfr_{lmN}, \\ \nabla\times\wfr_{lmN} = +ik\wfr_{lmM}.
\f] | | | \f[ \f] | | | \f[
\vect E = \sum_\alpha \pr{ \wcrreg_\alpha \wfrreg_\alpha + \wcrout_\alpha \wfrout_\alpha }, \\ \vect E = \sum_\alpha \pr{ \wcrreg_\alpha \wfrreg_\alpha + \wcrout_\alpha \wfrout_\alpha }, \\
@ -140,9 +143,11 @@ Literature convention tables
\wcrout_\alpha \sigma_\alpha\wfrout_\overline{\alpha}}, \wcrout_\alpha \sigma_\alpha\wfrout_\overline{\alpha}},
\f] where \f$ \sigma_{lmM} = +1, \sigma_{lmN}=-1, \overline{lmM}=lmM, \overline{lmN}=lmM, \f$ cf. eq. (6). The notation is not extremely consistent throughout Reid's memo. | | | \f] where \f$ \sigma_{lmM} = +1, \sigma_{lmN}=-1, \overline{lmM}=lmM, \overline{lmN}=lmM, \f$ cf. eq. (6). The notation is not extremely consistent throughout Reid's memo. | | |
| Taylor \cite taylor_optical_2011 | \f[ | Taylor \cite taylor_optical_2011 | \f[
\wfet_{mn}^{(j)} = \frac{n(n+1)}{kr}\sqrt{\frac{2n+1}{4\pi}\frac{\left(n-m\right)!}{\left(n+m\right)!}}P_{n}^{m}\left(\cos\theta\right)e^{im\phi}z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right)\uvec{r} \\ \wfet_{mn}^{(j)} = \frac{n(n+1)}{kr}\sqrt{\frac{2n+1}{4\pi}\frac{\left(n-m\right)!}{\left(n+m\right)!}}\Fer[Taylor]{n}{m}\left(\cos\theta\right)e^{im\phi}z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right)\uvec{r} \\
+\left[\tilde{\tau}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\theta}+i\tilde{\pi}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\phi}\right]e^{im\phi}\frac{1}{kr}\frac{\ud\left(kr\,z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right)\right)}{\ud(kr)}, \\ +\left[\tilde{\tau}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\theta}+i\tilde{\pi}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\phi}\right]e^{im\phi}\frac{1}{kr}\frac{\ud\left(kr\,z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right)\right)}{\ud(kr)}, \\
\wfmt_{mn}^{(j)} = \left[i\tilde{\pi}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\theta}-\tilde{\tau}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\phi}\right]e^{im\phi}z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right) \wfmt_{mn}^{(j)} = \left[i\tilde{\pi}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\theta}-\tilde{\tau}_{mn}\left(\cos\theta\right)\uvec{\phi}\right]e^{im\phi}z_{n}^{j}\left(kr\right).
\f] Assuming the Legendre functions \f$ \Fer[Taylor]{n}{m} \f$ here do contain the Condon-Shortley phase (AFAIK not explicitly stated in the book), i.e. \f$\Fer[Taylor]{l}{m} = \dlmfFer{l}{m} \f$, then the relation to Kristensson's waves is \f[
\wfmt_{mn} = \sqrt{n(n+1)} \wfkc_{1nm}, \\ \wfet_{mn} = \sqrt{n(n+1)} \wfkc_{2nm}.
\f] | | \f[ \f] | | \f[
\int_{S(kr)} \wfmt_{mn}^{(j)} \wfmt_{m'n'}^{(j)}\,\ud S = n(n+1) \abs{z_n^{(j)}}^2 \delta_{m,m'}\delta_{n,n'} ,\\ \int_{S(kr)} \wfmt_{mn}^{(j)} \wfmt_{m'n'}^{(j)}\,\ud S = n(n+1) \abs{z_n^{(j)}}^2 \delta_{m,m'}\delta_{n,n'} ,\\
\int_{S(kr)} \wfet_{mn}^{(j)} \wfet_{m'n'}^{(j)}\,\ud S = \int_{S(kr)} \wfet_{mn}^{(j)} \wfet_{m'n'}^{(j)}\,\ud S =

6
notes/mathjax_newcommands.js
View File

@ -33,14 +33,16 @@ MathJax.Hub.Config({
csphase: "\\mathsf{C_{CS}}", // Condon-Shortley phase csphase: "\\mathsf{C_{CS}}", // Condon-Shortley phase
// Kristensson's VSWFs, complex version (2014 notes) // Kristensson's VSWFs, complex version (2014 notes)
wfkc: "{\\vect{y}}", // any wave
wfkcreg: "{\\vect{v}}", // regular wave wfkcreg: "{\\vect{v}}", // regular wave
wfkcout: "{\\vect{u}}", // outgoing wave wfkcout: "{\\vect{u}}", // outgoing wave
wckcreg: "{a}", // regular wave coeff wckcreg: "{a}", // regular wave coeff
wckcout: "{f}", // outgoing wave coeff wckcout: "{f}", // outgoing wave coeff
// Kristensson's VSWFs, real version (2014 book) // Kristensson's VSWFs, real version (2014 book)
wfkrreg: "{\\vect{v}}", // regular wave wfkr: "{\\vect{y}_{\\mathrm{r}}}", // any wave
wfkrout: "{\\vect{u}}", // outgoing wave wfkrreg: "{\\vect{v}_{\\mathrm{r}}}", // regular wave
wfkrout: "{\\vect{u}_{\\mathrm{r}}}", // outgoing wave
wckrreg: "{a}", // regular wave coeff wckrreg: "{a}", // regular wave coeff
wckrout: "{f}", // outgoing wave coeff wckrout: "{f}", // outgoing wave coeff