lpy: y-indexed Legendre polynomials
Former-commit-id: 4dbf98563d1d09ab1ceffbedbb827bac8bccd88d
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e117f301b
commit
704a065ca1
|
@ -1172,7 +1172,24 @@ gmm_f2py_module.f90
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end_deeper
|
\end_deeper
|
||||||
\begin_layout Section
|
\begin_layout Section
|
||||||
Code integration
|
Implementation / code integration
|
||||||
|
\end_layout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||||
|
There are several scipy functions to compute the Legendre polynomials.
|
||||||
|
lpmv is ufunc, whereas lpmn is not; lpmn can, however, compute also the
|
||||||
|
derivatives.
|
||||||
|
This is a bit annoying, because I have to iterate the positions with a
|
||||||
|
for loop.
|
||||||
|
\end_layout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||||
|
The default gsl legendre function (gsl_sf_legendre_array) without additional
|
||||||
|
parameters has opposite sign than the scipy.special.lpmn, and it should contain
|
||||||
|
the Condon-Shortley phase; thus scipy.special.lpmn probably does NOT include
|
||||||
|
the CS phase.
|
||||||
|
But again, this should hopefully play no role.
|
||||||
|
The overall normalisation, on the other hand, plays huge role.
|
||||||
\end_layout
|
\end_layout
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin_layout Section
|
\begin_layout Section
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue