Minor docs update in scatsystem.h
Former-commit-id: 78caf1608c4ade295d47c17c20fb5743396cc8e8
This commit is contained in:
parent
b708b74292
commit
8f90842b24
|
@ -232,10 +232,15 @@ typedef struct qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t {
|
|||
* by their values with given tolerances. The T-matrix generators are expected
|
||||
* to preserve the point group symmetries for all frequencies.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This particular function will likely change in the future.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* \returns An instance \a sso of qpms_scatsys_omega_t. Note that \a sso->ss
|
||||
* must be saved by the caller before destroying \a sso
|
||||
* (with qpms_scatsys_at_omega_free(), and destroyed only afterwards with
|
||||
* qpms_scatsys_free() when not needed anymore.
|
||||
* \a sso->ss can be reused for different frequency by a
|
||||
* qpms_scatsys_at_omega() call.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t *qpms_scatsys_apply_symmetry(const qpms_scatsys_t *orig, const struct qpms_finite_group_t *sym,
|
||||
complex double omega, const struct qpms_tolerance_spec_t *tol);
|
||||
|
@ -243,9 +248,15 @@ qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t *qpms_scatsys_apply_symmetry(const qpms_scatsys_t *orig,
|
|||
/// Destroys the result of qpms_scatsys_apply_symmetry or qpms_scatsys_load.
|
||||
void qpms_scatsys_free(qpms_scatsys_t *s);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Destroys the result of qpms_scatsys_eval_at_omega()
|
||||
/// Destroys a qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t.
|
||||
/** Used on results of qpms_scatsys_apply_symmetry() and qpms_scatsys_at_omega(). */
|
||||
void qpms_scatsys_at_omega_free(qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t *ssw);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Evaluates scattering system T-matrices at a given frequency.
|
||||
/** Free the result using qpms_scatsys_at_omega_free() when done. */
|
||||
qpms_scatsys_at_omega_t *qpms_scatsys_at_omega(const qpms_scatsys_t *ss,
|
||||
complex double omega);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Creates a "full" transformation matrix U that takes a full vector and projects it onto an symmetry adapted basis.
|
||||
/** Mostly as a reference and a debugging tool, as multiplicating these big matrices would be inefficient.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue