Separate directory for notes
Former-commit-id: c262384aeb8ff266d7160082c233e0eab2fb902e
This commit is contained in:
parent
890dbc3e76
commit
231ee844d1
|
@ -311,8 +311,28 @@ reference "eq:W definition"
|
|||
In electrostatics, one can solve this with problem with Ewald summation.
|
||||
Its basic idea is that if what asymptoticaly decays poorly in the direct
|
||||
space, will perhaps decay fast in the Fourier space.
|
||||
I use the same idea here, but things will be somehow harder than in electrostat
|
||||
ics.
|
||||
I use the same idea here, but everything will be somehow harder than in
|
||||
electrostatics.
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Section
|
||||
(Appendix) Hankel transform
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Standard
|
||||
Acording to Wikipedia page on Hankel transform,
|
||||
\begin_inset Formula
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\uaft f(\vect k)=
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\end_inset
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end_layout
|
||||
|
||||
\begin_layout Section
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue